socialreporters.net Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the socialreporters.net

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host socialreporters.net. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Future Hosting LLC .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home about community enablers dtlater dtye explorations ppchange socialreporters explorations of social action and social media social technology in later life – moving from exploration to cooperation posted by david wilcox on may 1, 2013 2 comments update: all dtlater exploration content has moved from the original wiki to this site in summary: the dtlater exploration showed a lot of action in the field of social technology and later life, but also suggested that more could be achieved through great cooperation. as a next step we are going to experiment with some active social reporting and network building to try and show how that might be possible. it’s an adhoc initiative by the team who have now completed the first phase of work. update: all content from the exploration is now on this site and nominet trust have published the final report here . although we have completed the initial dtlater work for nominet trust, exploring how we can use social technology in later life, those involved are all keen to make the most of the ideas we brought together, and help others do the same. i think a next stage could work at several levels. first, nominet trust are reviewing how best to promote the first results of the exploration, summarised here , and we hope that will inform future developments and and anyone proposing projects. secondly, there’s a lot of additional information and contacts in our background reference that could be reworked. we identified 10 key propositions from the exploration … but there are potentially many more. thirdly, the exploration provided some insights into the nature of the ecosystem of organisations, entrepreneurs and investors in this field … and that’s what i want to focus on here. in doing that, i’ll draw a line under our initial work for the trust, and emphasise that what follows is a purely personal opinion, and a jumping off point for some further independent exploration and connecting. a lot of action, unconnected what struck me during the dtlater exploration was how unconnected everything is – strongly confirming the findings of shirley ayres, reported in this post . shirley has been reporting on social technology in social care, and recommends a knowledge hub to promote more sharing. i found unconnectedness on several fronts: many research reports covering the same ground but with limited cross reference, and difficult to find and cite. little knowledge of the research among practitioners funders developing new programmes when we don’t have well-shared knowledge of the many innovations already in the field, which are often struggling to scale up their operations. those trying to help people later in life adopt social technology are left without much guidance drawn from all this work so how could we make more of the ideas and assets that we already have, and avoid duplication in funding further research and project work? a framework and support structures fortunately the social innovation agency nesta is providing a framework for looking generally at innovation later in life, as i reported here , and developing an extremely useful living map of innovation projects . i think this gives a top-level opportunity to connect many of the strands identified above … but how might that translate into something directly useful to people later in life, and those aiming to provide support? i touched on this earlier and linked it to the work fellow socialreporter john popham has been doing with another nominet trust-funded project, our digital planet. john, nick booth and lloyd davies have been running odp exhibitions in town centres, and identified the following needs an independent source of advice with no selling agenda for those (particularly older people) bewildered by the array of modern technology options; a non-judgemental introduction to it and the internet for the digitally-excluded; a resource that recognises that there are multiple barriers in people’s lives which prevent them from using the internet and listens to their concerns before dispelling advice; a high profile hub, which demonstrates to the non-internet user that internet use is a normal part of most people’s everyday life; an enhancement to the local environment, and a new destination. developing these ideas for bottom-up support – perhaps within the framework provided by nesta – could be a good way forward. there are now a couple of substantial propositions for support programmes that could be the basis for further development. the age action alliance digital inclusion group has produced a paper entitled the ‘ digital champions capacity building framework ’, drafted by emma solomon of digital unite, that sets out how to build a network of professional and informal support. the sus-it project at loughborough university, led by professor leela damoddaran, supported by the kt-equal project, has produced proposals for community hubs where older people could learn about technology in a social setting. report here (pdf). there are further details here of how that might be implemented, based on discussion at a st george’shouse event in november last year. moving towards co-operation i think the ideas from our digital planet, age action alliance, and sus-it, have much in common. they could be supplemented through connections with the many projects identified by nesta and our exploration. they could give practical expression to many of the recommendations i’ve seen in research reports, and priorities suggested in our exploration. but – achieving that would require greater levels of co-operation than we have seen so far. a number of people have remarked to me that the field of digital inclusion, and social technology later in life, is marked by pretty intense competition between the many interests in the field, as everyone tries to pitch their idea and get funding to carry on their work. as a reporter, it would be easy to highlight examples of duplication, lack of communication, and funding overlaps. but as a social reporter i’m more interested in how to help people make sense of this complex area, and to help in joining up ideas and people amongst those who are prepared to cooperate as a first step, instead of thinking about a one-stop knowledge hub for sharing, we could take the model of a social ecology, outlined here by another of our team, steve dale. in order to reinforce a people-centred approach, we could develop further the story-telling methods drew mackie and i have worked on, as i reported here . and we could exchange ideas with people who are tackling the same issues in other countries, as i started here with noman reiss in new york . starting some further conversations all members of the team are freelance, and we don’t have funding for this next stage, so it’s going to be something we develop as part of our general enthusiasm for social technology for social good. i hope we can show pro-active social reporting is valuable, and we might be able get some further funding. i’ll do some more reporting round the major programmes that are emerging, and explore further us-uk exchanges. john will report from the frontline through the events, exhibitions and projects he is working on. to distinguish this from the first phase work, john will report on his blog and i’ll use mine , with occasional summaries back here. we have had some useful exchanges in the dtlater group on the social learning network and will keep that going. do join us. however, as a new dimension i’m thinking about experimenting with a yammer network . yammer is a bit like private twitter for a group, with no limit on message length. it is works very well on mobile devices, and is easier and chattier than forum exchanges. my current thinking is that the network will be for anyone who is prepared to commit to sharing ideas and resources, and from that exploring possible new collaborations next steps this rather lengthy blog post aims to sign-off work so far, and provide a rationale for our exp

URL analysis for socialreporters.net

http://socialreporters.net/?tag=biglocal
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=tsrc
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=young-people
http://socialreporters.net/?p=978#comments
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=biglotteryfund
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=consumerfocus
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=oursociety
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=media-trust
http://socialreporters.net/?m=201109
http://socialreporters.net/?p=886#comments
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=socialspaces
http://socialreporters.net/?feed=comments-rss2
feed://www.socialreporters.net/?feed=rss2&cat=52
http://socialreporters.net/?p=960
http://socialreporters.net/?tag=ppchange-2
www-core.nesta.org.uk
agenda-efa.org.uk
go-on.co.uk
kt-equal.org.uk
mediablends.org.uk
ageuk.org.uk
nominettrust.org.uk
sociallearning.org.uk
partnerships.org.uk
microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Whois Server Version 2.0

Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.

Domain Name: SOCIALREPORTERS.NET
Registrar: TUCOWS DOMAINS INC.
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 69
Whois Server: whois.tucows.com
Referral URL: http://www.tucowsdomains.com
Name Server: NS1.FAST-HOSTS.ORG
Name Server: NS2.FAST-HOSTS.ORG
Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 22-dec-2016
Creation Date: 08-jan-2007
Expiration Date: 08-jan-2019

>>> Last update of whois database: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 13:15:55 GMT <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR TUCOWS DOMAINS INC.

  REFERRER http://www.tucowsdomains.com

SERVERS

  SERVER net.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =socialreporters.net

  PORT 43

  SERVER whois.tucows.com

  ARGS socialreporters.net

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME socialreporters.net

NSERVER

  NS1.FAST-HOSTS.ORG 213.171.192.238

  NS2.FAST-HOSTS.ORG 213.171.192.237

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

  CHANGED 2016-12-22

  CREATED 2007-01-08

  EXPIRES 2019-01-08

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .